<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Tailscale on Dad's a Nerd!</title><link>https://dadsanerd.com/tag/tailscale/</link><description>Recent content in Tailscale on Dad's a Nerd!</description><generator>Hugo</generator><language>en-US</language><lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:13:41 -0400</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://dadsanerd.com/tag/tailscale/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Tailscale vs. WireGuard on pfSense: Which Should You Run?</title><link>https://dadsanerd.com/tailscale-vs-wireguard-pfsense/</link><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 19:12:37 -0400</pubDate><guid>https://dadsanerd.com/tailscale-vs-wireguard-pfsense/</guid><description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Short answer:&lt;/strong&gt; run WireGuard on pfSense if you can open a UDP port, and add Tailscale if you&amp;rsquo;re behind CGNAT or need to hand access to people who won&amp;rsquo;t edit a config file. The encryption is identical — Tailscale is WireGuard with a control plane on top. The deciding factor on pfSense is that FreeBSD can&amp;rsquo;t run Tailscale&amp;rsquo;s kernel mode, so subnet routing and exit nodes go through a userspace stack, which changes how packets are forwarded and makes exit node duty noticeably slow.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>